When attorneys examine other attorneys, anticipate a legal chess game to occur.
That’s the circumstance playing out today in Washington, as Congress aims to get previous FBI lawyer Lisa Page to affirm about anti-Trump texts she exchanged with FBI representative Peter Strzok, with whom she was having an affair.
Strzok was associated with the examination of President Donald Trump over accusations his governmental project conspired with Russian authorities.
Congress released a subpoena for Page to affirm, but she cannot appear for a Wednesday deposition.
That triggered Speaker of your house Paul Ryan to threaten Page with contempt of Congress.
” I am very interrupted by this,” Ryan stated of Page’s no-show throughout an interview. “Congressional subpoenas for statement are not optional. … She belonged of a mess that they have actually revealed over at DOJ. She has a commitment to come affirm.”.
” If she wishes to come plead the Fifth, that’s her choice,” Ryan included. “But a subpoena to affirm before Congress is not optional. It’s obligatory. She has to comply.”.
Not only did Page avoid the deposition, the simple act of serving her with the subpoena ended up being anything but procedural.
Republican Politician Rep. Robert Goodlatte of Virginia stated Wednesday that Page’s lawyer at first consented to accept service of the subpoena for Page, but “then reversed and right away aimed to decline it,” according to Fox News.
Goodlatte stated legislators were required to contact U.S. Marshals to serve Page with the subpoena. “They needed to go back 3 times before they were lastly able to reach her,” Goodlatte stated.
He included that Page’s choice to not appear at the deposition were actions constant with her having “something to conceal.”.
Page’s lawyer, Amy Jeffress, stated her customer did not appear Wednesday because she did not have time to prepare, declaring Page had actually been rejected access to FBI files required for her to get ready for questioning.
” Through her actions and words, Lisa has actually made it perfectly clear that she will work together with this examination. All she is asking is to be dealt with as other witnesses have under the Committees’ own guidelines,” Jeffress stated in a declaration.
In the most recent twist in the Page chess match, Goodlatte stated in an interview with CNN Thursday that Jeffress concurred late Wednesday for Page to give personal statement to the Judiciary Committee on Friday..
It is fascinating when somebody who dealt with the country’s leading police does everything they can to not comply with a Congressional examination. Even if Page declares she has every intent of being totally cooperative with legislators, her actions are not constant with her words. Friday will show if she really means to comply … or obfuscate.